Missing Typescript implementation

[BrightShadow]

Typings for CEP-Interface are quite old so maybe we can use those from my repo? https://github.com/BrightShadow/CSInterface-TS

Forgive me for not being familiar with Typescript... What are the advantages of this?

[BrightShadow]

No problem :-)
E.g. You can write component in Angular2, Aurelia Typescript etc. Having this allows you to freely just install NPM and just start working with it.

This is not only typescript sometimes we need to use this for ES2015, it is useful then too.

[pixels4nickels]

I would like to see this for ES2015 as well in order to streamline packaging and building as well as gain type safety during development.

…

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:51 PM, BrightShadow ***@***.***> wrote: No problem :-) E.g. You can write component in Angular2, Aurelia Typescript etc. Having this allows you to freely just install NPM and just start working with it. This is not only typescript sometimes we need to use this for ES2015, it is useful then too. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#109 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHAa-pBBBq42AHSHY8cJ0wwgRiD5PqWks5rsU2lgaJpZM4Mcmw1> .

[brianmontanaweb]

I'm currently updating CSInterface to TypeScript while doing a deep dive into TypeScript 😲 If it works out, I'll submit a PR

[NaviMarella]

There is already a Repo which needs to be updated.

https://github.com/BrightShadow/CSInterface-TS

@brianmontanaweb Is this what you are looking for ??

Also this PR has the required information, I am sure, we can move this as a separate npm package.#144

[sroucheray]

I'm restarting the discussion. It's possible to generate TypeScript type definition files automatically with tsc, the TypeScript compiler. It will use the JSDocs for typing. I think it could completely be automated.
The problem I'm facing is that the types aren't defined in the JSDoc comments.

I was wondering why the typing information is missing and if you couldn't add it? Or would you accept an MR?

It should look something like this :

/**
 * @class Version
 * Defines a version number with major, minor, micro, and special
 * components. The major, minor and micro values are numeric; the special
 * value can be any string.
 *
- * @param major The major version component, a positive integer up to nine digits long.
+ * @param major {number} The major version component, a positive integer up to nine digits long.
- * @param minor The minor version component, a positive integer up to nine digits long.
+ * @param minor {number} The minor version component, a positive integer up to nine digits long.
- * @param micro The micro version component, a positive integer up to nine digits long.
+ * @param micro {number} The micro version component, a positive integer up to nine digits long.
- * @param special The special version component, an arbitrary string.
+ * @param special {string} The special version component, an arbitrary string.
 *
 * @return A new \c Version object.
 */
function Version(major, minor, micro, special)

ping @ErinFinnegan