refactor: remove link to Lotti doc from GETTING_STARTED doc

[cyberk1ng]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Removed an outdated documentation reference from the getting started guide's "Next Steps" section to streamline the onboarding experience.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @cyberk1ng, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on refining the GETTING_STARTED.md documentation by eliminating a specific external link. The change aims to ensure the guide remains current and free of potentially misleading or obsolete references, thereby improving the clarity and accuracy for new users.

Highlights

• Documentation Cleanup: Removed an outdated or irrelevant link to the 'Lotti Documentation' from the GETTING_STARTED.md file.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Removed the final line and preceding blank line from the "Next Steps" section of GETTING_STARTED.md that referenced Lotti Documentation. No other content modifications or structural changes were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Documentation updates GETTING_STARTED.md	Removed final line pointing to Lotti Documentation and the preceding blank line from the "Next Steps" section

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• docs: add Getting Started guide for AI setup #2491: Modifies the same GETTING_STARTED.md file; the retrieved PR previously added or overhauled this documentation while the current PR removes specific content from it.

Suggested reviewers

• matthiasn

Poem

🐰 A line took flight, a blank line too,
From Next Steps' end, now trimmed anew,
No Lotti link to lead the way,
The doc is lean—hooray, hooray! 📝

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: removing a link to Lotti documentation from the GETTING_STARTED.md file.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/remove-link-to-lotti-doc

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9e49ea4 and 78ea500.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• GETTING_STARTED.md (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• GETTING_STARTED.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)

• GitHub Check: flatpak
• GitHub Check: Matrix Test on Linux
• GitHub Check: Matrix Test on Linux with degraded network
• GitHub Check: Flutter Test on Linux
• GitHub Check: Flutter Analyze on Linux

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request removes a link to the Lotti documentation from the GETTING_STARTED.md file. While the change is simple, I've raised a concern that removing this link could negatively impact users looking for more detailed documentation, especially since the linked repository appears to still be active for hosting images used in this guide. I've recommended reconsidering this removal to maintain the quality of the documentation.

I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.

GETTING_STARTED.md (234-235)

This change removes a link to what appears to be the main documentation repository. Since this guide uses images hosted in that same repository (lotti-docs), it seems to still be active. Removing this link may make it difficult for users to find more detailed documentation. Please consider restoring this link to improve user experience, unless the linked repository is being deprecated.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.48%. Comparing base (9e49ea4) to head (78ea500).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2495   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.48%   85.48%           
=======================================
  Files         668      668           
  Lines       36705    36705           
=======================================
  Hits        31378    31378           
  Misses       5327     5327           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.