Skip to content

Conversation

@igorpecovnik
Copy link
Member

@igorpecovnik igorpecovnik commented Nov 12, 2025

Added information about the first user configuration file and its functionality.

Create docs preview on PR

Documentation website preview will be available shortly:


 Open WWW preview 

Added information about the first user configuration file and its functionality.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 12, 2025

Walkthrough

This change adds a new documentation subsection titled "User provided first config" to the Developer Guide. The subsection describes the handling of the userpatches/firstboot.conf configuration file, including its location, the conditions that trigger its use, and the resulting behavior (displaying an informational alert and applying the first configuration).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Documentation-only change: No code logic, functionality, or exported declarations are affected
  • Single file modification: Only docs/Developer-Guide_User-Configurations.md is altered
  • Minimal scope: Simple descriptive text addition within an existing document structure

Areas to review:

  • Accuracy of the feature description against actual implementation
  • Consistency with existing documentation formatting and terminology
  • Clarity and completeness of the path, trigger, and effect descriptions

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title directly and clearly describes the main change: adding documentation about first user configuration file usage.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description check ✅ Passed The pull request description accurately relates to the changeset, which adds documentation about the first user configuration file.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch igorpecovnik-patch-3

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/small PR with less then 50 lines Needs review Seeking for review labels Nov 12, 2025
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/Developer-Guide_User-Configurations.md (1)

16-20: Consider adding inline format hints and an example preset key to improve developer usability.

The referenced link (docs.armbian.com/User-Guide_Autoconfig) is comprehensive and covers the full directive list and format specifications. However, developers reading this section would benefit from a brief inline example showing the shell-style format and a few common preset keys (e.g., PRESET_ROOT_PASSWORD, PRESET_LOCALE) before directing them to the full docs.

The current section is complete as-is, but adding 2–3 lines with format and example usage would improve discoverability and save developers a click.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7263b2c and 80be236.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/Developer-Guide_User-Configurations.md (1 hunks)

@igorpecovnik igorpecovnik merged commit f0acd95 into main Nov 12, 2025
1 check passed
@igorpecovnik igorpecovnik deleted the igorpecovnik-patch-3 branch November 12, 2025 16:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs review Seeking for review size/small PR with less then 50 lines

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants