Skip to content

Conversation

@ddbeck
Copy link
Collaborator

@ddbeck ddbeck commented Dec 11, 2025

BCD has added a new tree of data for media-types (modeled mostly after IANA's Media Types) in mdn/browser-compat-data#27168, so we can derive such features' statuses from BCD, instead of supplying our own data.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the feature definition Creating or defining new features or groups of features. label Dec 11, 2025
Comment on lines +25 to +38
# safari: "16.4"
# safari_ios: "16.1"
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a slight difference between web-features and BCD here, with BCD reporting a few minor versions later. I don't think this is significant and does not affect the Baseline low date.

support:
chrome: "32"
chrome_android: "32"
edge: "79"
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BCD doesn't know about support in EdgeHTML (i.e., it's a ≤79 value), so this looks later than the data we have. We could contribute the Edge 18 value upstream. This does not affect the Baseline low date (which hinges on Safari 14).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Contributing the Edge 18 value upstream sounds like the right thing to do. Especially because we can just point to https://caniuse.com/webp as a reference for that value.
This doesn't need to block this PR though.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sent mdn/browser-compat-data#28653, which has already been merged. We'll pick this up on the next BCD release.

Comment on lines +11 to +12
firefox: "113"
firefox_android: "113"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The difference for Firefox is explained by a note at https://caniuse.com/avif. In 93, Firefox only support still avif images. Animated support came in 113.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

feature definition Creating or defining new features or groups of features.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants